Which point in the passage is supported by a specific example?

Which point in the passage is supported by a specific example?

• A. Professors find positions through national searches
• B. Hiring committees show bias against local candidates
• C. Blurring lines between "student" and "citizen"
• D. Most students attend colleges in their home states

Answer: (B)

The point regarding hiring committees showing bias against local candidates is supported by a specific example in the passage. This is typically illustrated by a specific scenario or case study that demonstrates how this bias manifests, possibly through anecdotal evidence or statistical data highlighting the disparities in hiring practices. Such examples provide concrete evidence that backs up the assertion of bias, making it a pivotal part of the argument being presented in the passage. In contrast, the other points may be too general or lacking in the specific details that would illustrate their validity through direct evidence. For example, while it is true that professors may find positions through national searches or that most students attend colleges in their home states, those statements may not be backed up with illustrative cases that provide a deeper understanding of the nuances involved. The blurring lines between "student" and "citizen" also sounds conceptual without specific instances that would validate that claim. Therefore, the selected point about bias against local candidates stands out due to its grounding in specific examples provided in the text.

The point regarding hiring committees showing bias against local candidates is supported by a specific example in the passage. This is typically illustrated by a specific scenario or case study that demonstrates how this bias manifests, possibly through anecdotal evidence or statistical data highlighting the disparities in hiring practices. Such examples provide concrete evidence that backs up the assertion of bias, making it a pivotal part of the argument being presented in the passage.

In contrast, the other points may be too general or lacking in the specific details that would illustrate their validity through direct evidence. For example, while it is true that professors may find positions through national searches or that most students attend colleges in their home states, those statements may not be backed up with illustrative cases that provide a deeper understanding of the nuances involved. The blurring lines between "student" and "citizen" also sounds conceptual without specific instances that would validate that claim. Therefore, the selected point about bias against local candidates stands out due to its grounding in specific examples provided in the text.